FDEmax vs Staff Augmentation
They rent you people. We own outcomes.
Staff augmentation fills seats and leaves delivery risk with you. FDEmax embeds forward deployed engineers who are accountable for what actually merges and runs in production.
Key Differentiators
Where the models actually diverge.
01
Accountability for outcomes
Staff aug is accountable for showing up. We commit to merged, working software against metrics agreed on day one.
02
Force multiplication
One embedded FDE directs agents that open dozens of reviewed pull requests. A contractor gives you one keyboard.
03
No ramp tax
Our playbooks for modernization and remediation transfer across engagements. Week one is assessment, week two is shipped code.
04
Clean exits
Everything we produce lives in your git history. Ending the engagement loses capacity, not institutional knowledge.
Honest Assessment
Which is right for you?
Choose Staff Augmentation if
- You need a specific skill for a role you will manage directly
- You already have strong delivery management and just need hands
- Headcount optics matter more than delivery risk
Choose FDEmax if
- You want delivery owned end to end, inside your environment
- Your bottleneck is legacy modernization or a security backlog, not one missing skill
- You want AI leverage with a human review gate, not more resumes
Staff augmentation sells headcount. FDEmax sells outcomes that merge.