FDEmax vs Traditional Consultancies
Skip the pyramid. Keep the evidence.
Accenture, Deloitte, and the big system integrators sell transformation programs measured in years and seven figures. FDEmax embeds an engineer who maps your operation in 30 days, then ships improvements in focused sprints you approve one at a time.
Key Differentiators
Where the models actually diverge.
01
Code, not recommendations
In delivery sprints, the deliverable is working software in your repos. If a recommendation matters, it arrives implemented, as a pull request you can review.
02
Weeks, not fiscal years
The Discovery Sprint produces an operating map and a quantified roadmap in 30 days, and delivery sprints follow in weeks. Transformation programs are still writing the strategy deck at that point.
03
No seven-figure minimums
One operation, one embedded FDE, one month. The entry point is sized so the evidence, not the sales cycle, drives expansion.
04
Seniors only
The person who scopes your engagement is the person accountable for delivery. Nobody learns on your codebase.
Honest Assessment
Which is right for you?
Choose Traditional Consultancies if
- You need organizational change management across thousands of people
- Procurement requires a global vendor with offices on every continent
- The problem is strategy and operating model, not software delivery
Choose FDEmax if
- The problem is code: legacy systems, security debt, slow delivery
- You want measurable results before committing serious budget
- You would rather review pull requests than steering-committee decks
Consultancies bill for the journey. FDEmax is accountable for the destination: merged, measured, running in production.